To put it succinctly, Maverick City Music is the audience on stage. Recently, they have collaborated with other artists such as Elevation Worship, Chandler Moore, and Brandon lake to produce music.
They released seven EP’s and eight albums, including:
- Maverick City Vol. 1 EP (2019)
- Maverick City Vol. 2 EP (2019)
- Maverick City Vol. 3, Part 1 (2020)
- Maverick City Vol. 3, Part 2 (2020)
- You Hold It All Together (EP, 2020)
- Maverick City Christmas (EP, 2020)
- Move Your Heart (EP, 2021)
- Jubilee (EP, 2021)
- Como En El Cielo (Spanish, 2021)
- Old Church Basement (with Elevation Worship, 2021)
- Jubilee: Juneteenth Edition (2021)
- Tribl I (with Tribl, 2021)
- Venga Tu Reino (2021)
- A Very Maverick Christmas (2021)
- Breathe (EP, 2022)
They won three awards last year, including one Billboard Music Award for Top Gospel Album for their album Maverick City Vol. 3 Part 1 and two GMA Doves: New Artist of the Year and Worship Album of the Year (Old Church Basement).
Also, check out my previous Maverick City Music reviews.
Lyrics can be found at https://genius.com/Maverick-city-music-son-of-suffering-lyrics.
Side Note: The Song Review Index page contains a separate entry for Bethel Music with a different score than this version. Take a look at the side notes within each section for an explanation of Bethel Music’s ratings. I am including Bethel Music’s version because part of them are co-authors of this song.
Note to new users: This is a different kind of review site! Read About the Berean Test and Evaluation Criteria prior to reading this review.
1. What message does the song communicate?
Jesus’ death on the cross granted us freedom from the consequences of our lawbreaking. Though the resurrection of Jesus is not mentioned, our worship of Him as King implies that we praise Christ who is alive. Jesus understands our pain through His experience, weeping for others and experiencing betrayal by His closest allies.
My only issue with this song is the final iteration of Chorus, which says that God still bleeds. This is patently false. Scripture tells us over and over again that Jesus died once and for all. Also, when He appeared to His Disciples, He wasn’t still bleeding.
Score: 8/10
Side Note: Bethel Music’s version at https://bethelmusic.com/resources/homecoming-live/son-of-suffering does not contain this offending lyric. Since this was the only issue, Bethel’s version would have received a score of 10/10.
2. How much of the lyrics line up with Scripture?
This song almost completely aligns with God’s inspired Word, except where, in the final Chorus, it says He still bleeds.
[Intro]
Lines 1 and 2: Filler.
[Verse 1]
Lines 1 and 2: Jesus is without sin (Isaiah 53:9, Matthew 27:24, John 19:4, 2 Corinthians 5:21, Hebrews 4:15, 1 Peter 1:18-19, 1 Peter 2:21-23, and 1 John 3:5).
Lines 2 and 4: Jesus is God who became a man (John 1:1, John 1:14, Romans 8:3, Philippians 2:5-8, Colossians 1:15, 1 Timothy 3:16, Hebrews 1:2-3, Hebrews 2:10, and 1 John 4:2).
Lines 5 and 6: Quotes from part of Isaiah 53:3, adding in the “Son of suffering” bit that connects this prophecy to Jesus, who paid the penalty for our lawbreaking (Isaiah 53:1-12, Matthew 20:28, Mark 10:45, John 1:29, John 3:16, John 19:30, Acts 4:12, Acts 20:28, Romans 5:6-10, Romans 6:23, 1 Corinthians 1:30, 1 Corinthians 6:20, 2 Corinthians 5:21, Galatians 1:3-4, Galatians 3:13, Ephesians 1:7, Colossians 2:14, 1 Timothy 2:6, Titus 2:14, Hebrews 9:12, Hebrews 9:15-26, 1 Peter 1:17-21, 1 Peter 2:24, 1 John 1:7, 1 John 2:1-2, and Revelation 5:9).
[Chorus]
Lines 1-4: This touches on one of the greatest mysteries of Christianity: How is Jesus both 100% God and 100% man simultaneously? We don’t know. But, the Bible teaches it, summarized in Colossians 2:9.
The final iteration of this section states that God still bleeds. This is incorrect. According to Hebrews 7:27, Hebrews 9:12, Hebrews 9:26-28, and Hebrews 10:10-14, He died once and for all. His sacrifice was not given over and over again. How can He still be bleeding for us? Also, no Scripture that describes Jesus’ post-resurrection appearances says or implies that Christ is still bleeding.
Lines 5-8: The word ‘Hallelujah” is a compound Hebrew phrase, with “hallelu” meaning “a joyous praise in song” and “jah” or “yah”, which refers to the Tetragrammaton YHWH. Put together, we are singing “we joyfully praise God in song” when we use this word. In this case, we worship Jesus (Matthew 2:11, Matthew 14:33, Matthew 21:9, Matthew 28:8-9, Matthew 28:16-17, Luke 24:50-53, John 12:13, and John 20:28).
Line 9: A call to Casper the friendly ghost.
[Verse 2]
Lines 1-6: Though there are some who think God isn’t interested in human affairs, Jesus proved otherwise. While we were sinners, Christ died for us (Romans 5:6-8), bearing the penalty of our lawbreaking onto Himself (Isaiah 53:4-11, Matthew 8:17, John 1:29, Galatians 3:13, and 1 Peter 2:24).
Line 7: Essentially repeats line 6.
[Interlude (1)]
Lines 1 and 2: See commentary on Chorus, line 9.
Lines 3-7: There are at least two instances where Jesus wept for other people. Namely, when He approached Jerusalem (Luke 19:41) and after Lazarus died (John 11:35). He also understands the pain of betrayal, observing His closest followers abandon Him in His greatest hour of need (Matthew 26:56, Mark 14:50, and John 16:31-32).
[Bridge]
Line 1: Jesus’ payment grants us freedom from the consequences of our lawbreaking (Psalm 119:45, Isaiah 58:6, Isaiah 61:1, John 3:16-21, John 8:31-36, John 10:10, Acts 13:38-39, Romans 6:1-23, Romans 8:1-4, Romans 8:20-21, 1 Corinthians 6:12, 1 Corinthians 7:21-23, 2 Corinthians 3:17, Galatians 2:4, Galatians 3:13, Galatians 3:22, Galatians 5:1, Galatians 5:13, Colossians 1:21-23, Hebrews 2:14-15, and 1 Peter 2:16).
Line 2: By His stripes we are healed (Isaiah 53:5 and 1 Peter 2:24). For an explanation, see line 1.
Line 3: Combines Jesus’ Kingship (Isaiah 9:6, Isaiah 11:10, Micah 5:2, Matthew 2:1-6, John 12:15, John 18:37, 1 Timothy 6:13-16, Revelation 17:14, and Revelation 19:11-16) with worship of Him (see Chorus, lines 5-7).
Line 4: All glory to God (Exodus 16:7, Exodus 24:17, Exodus 40:34-35, Leviticus 9:23, 1 Chronicles 29:11, Psalm 3:3, Psalm 8:1, Psalm 19:1-4, Isaiah 6:1-3, Isaiah 40:5, Isaiah 42:8, Isaiah 58:8, Isaiah 60:1, Habakkuk 2:14, John 1:14, John 17:22, Romans 3:23, 2 Corinthians 3:18, 2 Corinthians 4:6, Philippians 4:19, Hebrews 1:1-3, Revelation 21:10-14, and Revelation 21:23).
Lines 5 and 6: The blood of Jesus speaks in the sense that it washes over sins (Ephesians 1:7, Hebrews 9:22, 1 Peter 1:2, and 1 Peter 1:18-19) is still available today.
Lines 7 and 8: Repeats lines 3 and 4.
Lines 9-14: Essentially repeats lines 1-8, in different ways.
[Interlude (2)]
Line 1: See Verse 2, lines 1-6.
Lines 2 and 3: Essentially repeats line 1.
Line 4: Proof of this is the lives of Christ-followers today.
Line 5-8: God is with Maverick City Music (Deuteronomy 31:6-8, Joshua 1:5-9, Psalm 23:4, Psalm 46:1, Psalm 139:7-10, Isaiah 41:10, Jeremiah 23:23-24, Zephaniah 3:17, Matthew 6:25-34, Matthew 28:20, John 14:16-17, Hebrews 13:5, Romans 8:38-39, and Revelation 3:20).
Lines 9-13: Essentially repeats Bridge, lines 1-4.
Line 14: That is, we should live for Him and not ourselves, surrendering to His will (Psalm 43:5, Isaiah 64:8, Matthew 10:38, Matthew 11:28-30, Matthew 16:24, Mark 8:34-38, Mark 10:28, Luke 9:23, Luke 14:27, John 15:1-11, Romans 6:13, Romans 12:1-2, Galatians 2:20, Philippians 2:5-8, Hebrews 11:6, James 4:7-10, and 1 Peter 5:6).
Line 15: Yes.
Line 16: This is so, because He is the Truth (John 14:6).
Line 17: Repeats Bridge, line 4.
Score: 8/10
Side Note: Bethel Music’s version would also receive 10/10 for the same reasons cited in the side note of section 1.
3. How would an outsider interpret the song?
Unbelievers will easily interpret this song as Christian, with references to “Son of God”, “Man of Sorrows”, “Hallelujah”, and “King Jesus”. Christians worship Jesus who is both divine and human, who died on the cross for sinners. The phrase “your stripes are my healing” is explained before the phrase is offered. However, the word “sinner” often means “person who makes mistakes” amongst those who don’t believe in Jesus. It could be clearer that “sinner” is someone who violates God’s laws.
Also, if they happen to notice that the final Chorus is slightly different, there is a good chance that they will be led astray into error, thinking that Jesus can be sacrificed more than once because He still bleeds.
Score: 7/10
Side Note: Based on commentary in the side note in section 1, Bethel Music’s version would have received a score of 9/10 for this section.
4. What does this song glorify?
It glorifies King Jesus as the One who takes away the sins of the world. In response to His lovingkindness, we praise and worship Him. However, it does not glorify Him when stating that He still bleeds when He does not.
Score: 8/10
Side Note: Bethel Music’s version would also receive 10/10 for the same reasons cited in the side note of section 1.
Closing Comments
Maverick City Music’s Son Of Suffering is mostly Biblical. It contains most of the elements of the Gospel, including our sinfulness, His rescue, our worship that implies His resurrection, and His understanding of our plight both intellectually and experientially. This glorifies God. Unbelievers should arrive at a similar conclusion, though they may not understand the meaning of a “sinner”. However, its statement that God is still bleeding is clearly untrue.
If this error could be rectified by removing the word “still”, then this song would be appropriate for corporate worship.
Final Score: 8/10
Side Note: Bethel Music’s version would have received a score of 9.5/10 with a corporate worship rating of “yes”.
Artist Info
Track: Son Of Suffering (listen to the song)
Artist: Maverick City Music (Feat. Mav City Gospel Choir, Chandler Moore & Jekalyn Carr)
Album: Jubilee: The Juneteenth Edition
Genre: Rock
Release Year: 2021
Duration: 5:55
Agree? Disagree? Don’t be shy or have a cow! Calmly and politely state your case in a comment, below.
Updates:
04/18/2023 – Based on reading Steve Barhydt’s comment, I added side notes to each section to explain how I would have rated Bethel Music’s version of this song. I also updated the Song Review Index to include an entry for Bethel Music.
02/01/2023 – Seth reported that Chorus’ final iteration states that God still bleeds. This is false. Therefore, I updated my review, lowering the overall score from 9.5/10 to 8/10. I also changed the corporate worship rating to “perhaps”.
05/03/2022 – Thanks to commenter Michael Ramsey, I learned that Maverick City Music is the earliest artist for this song! Thus, I altered the entire review to orient it around their version. I also forgot to finish commenting on Bridge, lines 5-8 in my original review. I included an Intro and two additional Interlude sections that weren’t in Bethel’s version. I removed the side note from section 1 because it’s MUCH less repetitious. This altered my recommendation for corporate worship. Finally, I removed Outro, as it doesn’t exist in this version.
Comments
songwriter
I can be picky as a songwriter and as a lover of Christ – but in this instance I actually really appreciate the poeticism here – saying “there’s a God who weeps, there’s a God who bleeds” is a beautiful reference to how He has revealed himself as God in flesh, that empathizes with our pain (weeps) and also sacrificed himself for us(bleeds)! Which ties the song together. it’s not meant to be time-sensitive or suggest even that he’s weeping now. if you take issue with “bleeds” then you should also take issue with “weeps” – it’s not suggesting a constant state of being. As He is not constantly weeping either. I am unfamiliar with the performed version of someone singing “still bleeds” but to my knowledge that was not in the original lyrics that I so appreciate. And in that case, it would make it time-specific, and i would agree that that is not a version I would sing of that one line. But I will sing the original all day.
Chris
It’s been a little bit since you have written the article, but I think it is problematic that the song refers to God as, “a God who weeps” and “a God who bleeds.” Not only does it imply that God still bleeds, but it the indefinite usage of “a” implies that there is more than one God. The definite article “the” would have been more accurate and appropriate.
Jason Henry
I don’t know that “still bleeds” deserves the hate it’s getting in this review and the comments. 😂
Are there literal wounds on Jesus’ still-existing body that are literally, physically dripping blood at this moment? Probably not, though the glorified Jesus of Revelation is still very closely associated with his death and his blood (see Rev 19:13 and 5:6).
That said, I think there is a very real sense in which God still bleeds. The primary message of this song is that Jesus identifies with and experiences the suffering of his people. His people, the Church, certainly still bleeds literally and metaphorically. Christians are persecuted for their faith, and Jesus bleeds with them. First Corinthians 12:26-27 calls the Church the Body of Christ, and tells us that when one part suffers, so does the whole body. Saying that God (Jesus) still bleeds isn’t a medical statement; it’s a statement of his identification with and participation in the life of his Body the Church.
Gabi
Totally agree Jason! Very glad you put this comment out there because it was exactly what I was thinking.
Kathleen Kennemer
Amen!
Fouzia
Son of suffering and still bleeds implies present tense. This could easily be fixed if said was a man of sorrows or suffered and bled verse still bleeds. Thank God, Jesus endured and suffered for our sake but also Hallelujah he is PRESENT tense on the throne in heaven next to God. He is NOT suffering and NOT bleeding. It was finished were His words.
Steve Barhydt
Vince,
I found this lyric and chord sheet on https://bethelmusic.com/resources/homecoming-live/son-of-suffering
and lyrics only on https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/bethelmusic/sonofsuffering.html.
Neither of these sources have the offending words ‘still bleeds’ The first being directly from Bethel Music’s website. (It also lists the songwriters as David Funk, Aaron Moses, Matt Redman and Nate Moore)
There is also this video from the songwriters that is the ‘official’ video for the song. At the 5:45 mark they are singing the last chorus and it does not say ‘still bleeds’
There is this video from Matt Redman’s Youtube page https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Th0EBeRPb6U&t=344s. At the 5:05 mark there is no ‘still bleeds’
I admit that the audio version of the song from Maverick City Music does say ‘still bleeds’ but I don’t believe that those words are part of the official lyrics. (It’s not shown on the screen in the video)
As you know, Genius Lyrics has been wrong before. My guess is that someone transcribed the lyrics from the Maverick City video and not the ‘official’ video.
As to why Maverick City says ‘still bleeds” I don’t know. The word ‘still’ does play a important part of the bridge (i.e. ‘Your blood, still speaking “, “Your love, still reaching”) I’m willing to say that it was a mistake on the singer’s part (perhaps a live recording.)
Regardless, the words ‘There’s a God who still bleeds’ do not appear to be part of the lyrics as the song was written and the original lyrics are the ones that should be analyzed and scored accordingly.
Vince Wright
Steve,
Thank you for your comments!
As you are aware, I am an originalist when it comes to examining song lyrics. One of the ways that I look for the “original” version is by comparing release dates for artists with the same song. Maverick City’s version was released on June 18th, 2021 (to coincide with Junteenth), while Bethel’s version came out on September 24, 2021. I went with Maverick’s version since it was released earliest. However, I’ll include Bethel’s version since some of the writers are from Bethel.
I’ll update the review to indicate that Bethel Music’s version does not contain the offending lyric and comment on how I’d score with it gone, and leave the rest of the review/scoring as-is. I’ll also add an entry to the Song Review Index for Bethel with updated scoring.
-Vince Wright
Steve Barhydt
Fair enough. Thanks
Ryan Dahl
Jesus is still a man, and still God. He has a body, still. A resurrected body. His body still has blood. I’m not 100% sure where he is, but didn’t he ascend as a man with a resurrected physical body? Where did he go? Wherever he is, he still bleeds (i.e. still has blood).
Todd
I want to start by saying that I’m biased since I like the song. This song helps me to deeply connect with the mystery of the cross and what Jesus did there for me. How can an act 2000 years ago apply to future events and cover sin that hasn’t happened yet? My current working assumption is that God made both time and space and lives outside of our timeline. Thus He effortlessly sees the end from the beginning, and from His perspective, the crucifixion is happening at the same time that I’m writing this note and thus covers my sins too.
Regarding “still bleeds,” the scripture reference is Luke 22:19–20; Matthew 26:26–28; Mark 14:22–24; and 1 Corinthians 11:23–25. I do not expect protestants to recognize these references in this context. In the Catholic tradition, they take these verses literally and thus have a high regard for the elements used during a Mass since they are the literal body and blood of Jesus. The priest consumes the elements after Mass since it’s the appropriate way to handle the blood of Jesus whereas a protestant preacher will put it on the shelf for the next communion or the usher might chuck it in the rubbish bin. Given the mystery of the Cross with respect to time, I’m willing to say either that Jesus bled for me or that Jesus bleeds for me. While I can’t imagine Jesus picturing each of us on the cross, He did die for all of us and knew that this was for both past and future sinners. I’d hope we’d find common ground in saying that Jesus’ sacrifice applies to all who believe in Him as their savor.
For me, “Son of Suffering” is a title for Jesus. NIV has Isaiah 53:3 as “man of suffering” so I’m assuming the songwriters took some liberty to introduce alliteration. Jesus is called the “Son of Man” even though the Spirit was His biological father. I believe Jesus would accept the title “Son of Suffering” just like I think he’d accept the title “King Jesus” another title that I can’t find in the scriptures.
I appreciate the desire to ground songs in verses.
Vince Wright
Todd,
Thanks for letting me know! I understand that this is a point of contention between protestants and Catholics. As a protestant, I don’t believe as you on this point, so it’s unsurprising that I would dock points while you’re OK with it based on the concept of re-sacrificing each mass, where the blood and body of Jesus are literally transubstantiated within the elements. Feel free to ignore my commentary and rescore accordingly.
-Vince Wright
Jason Henry
Thanks for providing a Catholic perspective on this lyric! That’s really interesting.
Carolyn
The phrase “Son of Suffering is not biblical! I’m not aware of anywhere in the Bible that Jesus was ever called that. If I’m mistaken l, please point me to the verse. Note that the analysis said they added that part in.
Jesus suffered but He is not the Son of Suffering! If Jesus is Son of Suffering then God is the God of Suffering. God is the Creator, He is Love, Jesus is the Redeemer, the Protector, the Healer…
It’s a great song except for that one phrase that tarnishes the whole thing.
Abbs
Carolyn,
Isaiah 53:3 calls him a “man of suffering.”
Hebrews 5:8 says “though he was a son, he learned obedience through his suffering” and I believe this verse is the origin of the song’s title. The point of the verse is that even though Jesus was the perfect Son of God he was still subjected to the test of suffering. I don’t believe the phrase Son of Suffering is meant to imply that Jesus is the offspring of suffering but that even as a Son, he endured suffering. I’ve heard him called the suffering Son of Man many times in reference to these verses.
These are just my thoughts!
Seth
So the last chorus says he’s the God who STILL bleeds. This is false, is it not? He bled on the cross but doesn’t continue to bleed.
Vince Wright
Seth,
Great catch! I updated my review.
-Vince Wright
Jen
I’m with Carolyn and as the phrase “son of Suffering” is not used biblically is therefore making up a new name for Jesus/God is bad enough. But words matter. Implications are anyone’s guess. But the SON of Suffering means God causes Suffering because HE is such. This song is a 2 in my book because this is the main stanza and… add the God weeps. Ouch. 2
Michelle
The phrase “Son of suffering” doesn’t sit well with me, either. Being referred to as a man of sorrows or man of suffering is very different than Son of suffering. Jesus endured extreme suffering. He also endured extreme temptation, but it does not follow that we would call him Son of temptation. To do so would be completely inappropriate, and would draw a connecting line of sonship there.
I understand that songs are poetry, but I really wish they had worked on this longer and avoided this particular phrase.
Michael Ramsey
I love this song! But side note this is actually NOT the original version. It was first released by Maverick City. The Mav version is 3 minutes shorter and slightly more on the gospel genre. Great review regardless.
Vince Wright
Michael,
Thanks for letting me know! I updated this review.
-Vince Wright