Sparrows

Photo by Will Bolding

by Vince Wright | April 4, 2021 | 9:00 am

Worship pastor Cory Asbury is part of Bethel’s network of worship leaders.  He began in 2005, interning with the International House of Prayer.  He became a full-fledged artist in 2007.  He released four albums, including:

  • Holy (2008)
  • Let Me See Your Eyes (2009)
  • Reckless Love (2018)
  • To Love a Fool (2020)

Asbury received three GMA Dove Awards, two K-Love Fan Awards, and one We Love Christian Music Award for his work on Reckless Love.

Check out my reviews of Christ Be Magnified, The Father’s HouseEndless Alleluia, and Reckless Love.

Lyrics can be found at https://genius.com/Cory-asbury-sparrows-lyrics.

Note to new users: This is a different kind of review site!  Read About the Berean Test and Evaluation Criteria prior to reading this review.  I strongly encourage you to consider the potential blessings and dangers of this artists theology by visiting Resources.

1. What message does the song communicate?

This song is about God taking care of Asbury, that he should focus on God’s love for him and not life’s worries.  He knows our needs without Asbury’s requests.  He sees Asbury’s future.  He is both affectionate and moral.

I have two chief complaints.  First, the Bridge, where Asbury claims there’s more, yet, He cannot get past God’s kindness and goodness.  This doesn’t make any sense to me.  Why would Asbury think there’s more when he rests in the arms of God?  What more is there than a personal relationship with the Almighty?  This is irreverent thinking.  Perhaps Asbury means “there’s more to God than His love; However, right now, His love is so wonderful that I cannot presently process anything else”.  If so, this is worded poorly.

Second, there’s nothing in this song that implicitly points to God that cannot point to a girlfriend or wife.  Under this interpretation, Asbury trusts her so much that he need not concern himself with anything else, much like Potiphar, the jailer, and Pharaoh did with Joseph in the book of Genesis.

Score: 4/10

2. How much of the lyrics line up with Scripture?

Almost all of it is Biblical.  However, I cannot find support for contrasting God’s goodness and kindness with something that goes beyond these attributes of God.

I deducted two points to assume “God” in these lyrics.

[Verse 1]

Lines 1-7: References Matthew 6:25-34 and Luke 12:22-32, where Jesus teaches us not to be anxious because He will take care of us.  Asbury also adds the tree that is planted by still waters (Psalm 1:3) to make the same point.

[Chorus]

Line 1: See commentary in Verse 1.

Line 2: Essentially repeats line 1.

Line 3: An equivalent rewording of Matthew 6:8.

Line 4: References Psalm 139:10.

Line 5: That is, God’s love is steadfast (Psalm 86:15 and Lamentations 3:22-24).

Line 6: This is so because God holds Asbury’s future in His hands (Proverbs 16:3, Jeremiah 29:11, Philippians 1:6, and Ephesians 2:10).

Line 7: Essentially repeats line 1.

[Verse 2]

Lines 1-6: Equivalent examples of Verse 1.

Line 7: Repeats Verse 1, line 7.

[Bridge]

Lines 1-4: I don’t understand what this means.  Yes, God is kind (Nehemiah 9:17, Psalm 17:7, Psalm 31:21, Psalm 36:7, Psalm 63:3, Psalm 69:16, Psalm 117:2, Isaiah 54:8, Isaiah 63:7, Ephesians 2:7, and Titus 3:4-6) and good (Psalm 27:13, Psalm 31:19, Psalm 34:8, Psalm 107:1, Psalm 119:68, Psalm 145:9, Mark 10:18, Luke 18:19, Romans 2:4, and James 1:17); However, what is this “more” that Asbury speaks of, and how would it contrast with God’s affection and virtue?  What transcends knowing God personally?  I don’t see any Scripture that would support this sort of thinking.  In fact, Paul says such things are rubbish (Philippians 3:8-10).

Lines 5-8: Repeats lines 1-4.

Score: 5/10

3. How would an outsider interpret the song?

Asbury uses everyday language to express his thoughts.  Though Christians will likely interpret this as God, without any clear pointers, unbelievers are more likely to conclude girlfriend than anything else.  Ironically, this interpretation makes more sense of Bridge, because there is more to life than a loving girlfriend.  Namely, a personal relationship with God!

Score: 5/10

4. What does this song glorify?

While it glorifies God that Asbury can depend on Him, to say there’s more to God than a personal relationship is misinformed at best and blasphemous at worst.  Also, its lack of pointers to God eases a secular interpretation, adding further cloudiness to His glory.

Score: 4/10

Closing Comments

Cory Asbury’s Sparrows is not that great.  If we assume that it talks about God, it showcases God’s lovingkindness towards Asbury, prompting him to avoid worry.  This glorifies God.  However, there’s nothing in these lyrics that shows unique attributes to God that can’t also find a secular interpretation, say, a girlfriend or a wife.  Also, Bridge makes more sense under the girlfriend interpretation than concluding God.

I cannot recommend this song for corporate worship.

Final Score: 4.5/10

Artist Info

Track: Sparrows (listen to the song)

Artist: Cory Asbury

Album: To Love A Fool

Genre: Rock

Release Year: 2020

Duration: 3:18

Agree?  Disagree?  Don’t be shy or have a cow!  Calmly and politely state your case in a comment, below.

Updates:

07/16/2021 – Per Artist Theology announcement, I expanded the red text to encourage others to study Bethel Music’s theology, which Asbury is a leader.

Comments

Michael Ramsey

I agree with your review. Although i am beginning to see a lot of reviews were the song is good but the rating is not. I just don’t think your rating reflects your review, but that is my opinion.

Apr 08.2022 | 09:44 am

Joseph Ketcham

I honestly disagree with your analysis of the bridge. The first time that I heard this song I really liked it. I interpreted the bridge as basically saying “There is so much more to God. But just thinking about his goodness I’m stopped in my tracks. There is so much more that I can not begin to comprehend, there must be more to God that I can explore. But I can’t get past His goodness.” I feel that is more explaining that we serve a God who is vast in complexity and that He is so awesome. but just thinking about His kindness and goodness, we are humbled before Him.

Jun 01.2021 | 07:57 pm

    Vince Wright

    Joseph,

    Thank you for your comments!

    This aligns with what I perceived that Asbury meant. I stated in section 1, “Perhaps Asbury means ‘there’s more to God than His love; However, right now, His love is so wonderful that I cannot presently process anything else’. If so, this is worded poorly.” So, I can agree that your interpretation is his intent.

    -Vince Wright

    Jun 01.2021 | 09:10 pm

    Lisa

    Thank you, I have been wondering about the bridge and this makes sense to me. I love the song and I would never think this song is about anything but God.

    Sep 13.2022 | 10:35 am

Jaime Finch

I don’t think that this song is talking about a girlfriend. I use it in my personal worship time and I know it’s talking about God.

May 09.2021 | 04:35 pm

Jonah

I honestly never noticed the contradiction in the bridge but I completely agree. Another spot on review. It’s absolutely bewildering that Asbury managed to write that and not notice that. Good exegetical processes are really lacking these days.

Apr 22.2021 | 03:56 pm

Steve Barhydt

I completely agree with your review on this song.

Every time I here this song on the radio, I am disappointed with the extremely confusing words of the bridge.

I really have no clue as to what Asbury is trying to say. We never “get past” the goodness and kindness of God. We live in those blessings every day and that lifestyle leads us into the “more” that Asbury can’t seem to find. It’s completely bafflingly what he is trying to say.

It’s a true shame because the rest of the song is pretty good, not great, but potentially worthy of singing.

As it is, however, it’s not even worthy of being on the radio.

Happy Easter and God bless

Apr 04.2021 | 03:49 pm

    Vince Wright

    Steve,

    Thank you for your feedback! Also, happy resurrection day!

    -Vince Wright

    Apr 04.2021 | 10:28 pm

    racefangurl

    Maybe you could sing it without the bridge lines, since you don’t like them?

    Apr 05.2021 | 04:49 pm

Mel

I believe your analysis is spot on. Anytime you can replace Christ or God in the song with your boyfriend’s or girlfriend’s name, you have nothing more than a secular writing that fails to bring glory to whom glory should be given. Too many songs out of Bethel, and even Elevation or Hillsong do this. When you have to try hard to associate scripture in understanding the song, that should be a signal to pass it by. From reading your analyses of other Asbury songs, there is a pattern; feel good songs that relegate God to less than Holy and Sovereign, non- evangelistic and without, much, scriptural basis.

Apr 04.2021 | 09:37 am

    Vince Wright

    Mel,

    Thank you for your feedback!

    I’ve had similar thoughts about Asbury’s music; However, I try hard to not allow that to color future reviews by this artist. I understand that songs like this could be interpreted as Christian and glorify God; However, it also irks me when it’s not inherently clear that such use is warranted.

    -Vince Wright

    Apr 04.2021 | 10:20 pm

NOTE: CHECK YOUR SPAM FOLDER FOR EMAIL NOTIFICATIONS! All comments must be approved prior to posting. Comments outside the scope of Berean Test reviews (especially on artist theology) will be edited and/or deleted. ENGLISH ONLY!

Discover more from The Berean Test

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading