Hot air balloons

Photo by ian dooley

by Vince Wright | October 14, 2018 | 12:00 pm

About a month ago, I wrote a glowing review of NEEDTOBREATHE’s Multiplied.  With three independent albums, six studio albums, and ten Dove awards, they have had a lasting impact on the Christian music genre.  Hopefully, Testify will have a similar effect on their listeners.

I learned something new about NEEDTOBREATHE as I prepared this article.  On April 20–22, 2017, they opened for Faith Hill and Tim MCGraw’s Soul2Soul The World Tour 2017.  This is fascinating considering that both play completely different genres and provides an opportunity for them to share Jesus with country listeners.

Lyrics can be found at https://genius.com/Needtobreathe-testify-lyrics.

Note to new users: This is a different kind of review site!  Read About the Berean Test and Evaluation Criteria prior to reading this review.

1. What message does the song communicate?

I find this message confusing.  What is NEEDTOBREATHE talking about?  I have a vague sense that they speak for God and Verse 2 line 1 has me convinced that this was the intent; However, pronoun capitalization would have helped.  Speaking for God is a very dangerous prospect which ought to handle with care.  Old Testament prophets were killed for falsely speaking on God’s behalf.  Unfortunately for NEEDTOBREATHE, they contradicted the Word of God on two occasions (see section 2), which would have earned their death under the old covenant.  This greatly compromises their message.

While I find it difficult to discern these mysterious lyrics, I postulate that NEEDTOBREATHE’s message is that God wants us to seek Him with all our hearts, away from the sinful lifestyle of our youth.  While this is a great message, they communicated it poorly.

Score: 2/10

2. How much of the lyrics line up with Scripture?

Its vague message makes it extremely difficult to discern its biblical accuracy.  For the majority of lyrics, the best I can offer is guesswork.  There are also several lines that run contrary to Scripture.

[Chorus]

Lines 1 and 2: While there are passages of Scripture that point to our sinful heart condition (Psalm 12:1-3, Jeremiah 17:9, Romans 3:10-12, and Romans 3:23), God transforming and protecting our heart (Psalm 37:4 and Philippians 4:7) and are commanded to trust in God with all our heart (Proverbs 3:5), the closest Scripture where God asks for our heart (or our song for that matter) is Jeremiah 29:13.

Line 3: Jesus is the source of the fountain that is living water (see Psalm 36:8-9, Psalm 87:7, Proverbs 14:27, Jeremiah 2:13, John 4:13-14, John 7:37-39, John 10:10, and Revelation 7:17).

Lines 4 and 5: Yes there is and yes you can, but where is it?  Is it in this fountain described in line 3?  That seems probable, but it’s not a clear as I would like.

Line 6: While the first part repeats the first part of line 3, the subject that speaks is still unclear.  Is it Jesus?  If so, I do not understand the connection between coming to the fountain that is Jesus and His desire to hear us testify.  Perhaps NEEDTOBREATHE refers to testimony as a means to spread the Gospel, consistent with Jesus’ great commission in Matthew 28:18-20?  Once again, it is not crystal clear.

[Verse 1]

Lines 1-3: What world is that?  My best guess is the world of sin, given the words “wild” and “youth” in line 1.

Lines 4 and 5: Assuming I am correct about lines 1-3 and that Jesus speaks in this verse, this runs contrary to Romans 5:6-8, which teaches Christ gave Himself even before we “let go”.  He died for us while we were in our sinful state.  It is not conditioned upon our repentance.

[Verse 2]

Line 1: Poetic license on the depths of God’s love.

Lines 2 and 3: Once again, this is a direct contradiction to Romans 5:6-8 for the same reasons cited in Verse 1, lines 4-5.

[Bridge]

Lines 1-4: Up until this point, I was able to either offer a clear passage of Scripture or an educated guess.  For these four lines, I have nothing to offer.  I considered that God’s creation reveals who He is (Genesis 1, Psalm 19:1-4, and Romans 1:20); however, it’s probably not that.

Score: 3/10

3. How would an outsider interpret the song?

Most likely, some sort of boyfriend or girlfriend in a more, shall we say, illicit relationship.  A satisfactory fountain.  Lost inside.  Giving away one’s self to someone else.  Deep calling to deep.  Letting go.  All the evidence is there for this alternative interpretation.  Sadly, this actually makes more sense than what NEEDTOBREATHE intended.  Ouch.

Score: 0/10

4. What does this song glorify?

I’m not sure what it glorifies.  If my interpretation offered in section 3 is correct, it is fornication.  If not, God’s glory is so thickly hidden, I can barely peer through the veil.

Score: 1/10

Closing Comments

NEEDTOBREATHE’s Testify is a major disappointment.  Its message about finding God is obfuscated with generic lyrics more likely interpreted as immoral relational behavior, with a few lines that contradict the Bible.  While this song does contain a few lines that correctly quote the Word of God, its overwhelmingly obscure stanzas barely glorifies God, if at all.

Steer clear from this one.

Final Score: 2/10

Artist Info

Track: Testify (listen to the song)

Artist: NEEDTOBREATHE

Album: H A R D L O V E

Genre: Pop, Rock

Release Year: 2016

Duration: 4:03

Agree?  Disagree?  Don’t be shy or have a cow!  Calmly and politely state your case in a comment, below.

Updates:

06/29/2021 – After consulting several sources, I changed my mind on the context and meaning of Psalm 42:7, which is about the depth of God’s severe dealings and not love.  Therefore, I removed it from this review.

Comments

Angella Kamaunu

Heya! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new apple iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward to all your posts! Keep up the outstanding work!

Jun 25.2019 | 06:55 pm

    tastywallet

    Angella,

    Thanks, much appreciated!

    -TastyWallet

    Jul 01.2019 | 12:42 pm

    Davey Barfoot

    Are you a spam comment? You you are extremely generic and vague, which is a sign of spam comments, and The Berean Test website isn’t a blog. It’s funny that this super generic comment happened to show up on a review of a vague and generic song…

    Sep 09.2021 | 12:08 am

Jeremy Melberg

It seems no one(except maybe needtobreathe), really know exactly what this song is about lyrically. I’m okay with that. Why do we need an intro, three point sermon, and conclusion to enjoy the art? It seems obvious they were not trying to do that(write a sermon) when the wrote the lyrics. Sure, its nice to get some solid, encouraging theology from our favorite bands, but it shouldn’t be a disappointment when they offer something more ambiguous.

i feel that words like “sloppy”, “dangerous”, and “underwhelming” are unfair descriptions.

On a side note, I’m sure they have contract obligations to their employer which limit what they can sing/write/talk about. They can’t always be direct and clear cut with their message.

Jun 06.2019 | 01:02 pm

    tastywallet

    Jeremy,

    Thanks for your comment! It’s probably the contractual obligation that produced this ambiguous song, at least, that’s what I want to believe. I understand your point about terminology, but I hope you can appreciate my honesty in how I felt about this song.

    -TastyWallet

    Jun 07.2019 | 01:18 pm

      Jeremy Melberg

      Yep, I do appreciate your honesty and the post for starting the conversation. keep it up, bro.

      Jun 10.2019 | 09:41 am

        tastywallet

        Jeremy,
        I wanted to let you know that I removed the adjectives “sloppy” and “underwhelming”. I agree that they were not fair. Vague is enough to get my point across.
        -TastyWallet

        Jun 12.2019 | 05:33 pm

    Ada Ortiz

    Needtobreathe doesnt classify themselves as a /christian/ band. Their music can be interpreted into a secular content or a spiritual content depending on the listener. Thier intent was to get people who wouldnt normally listen to any form of religious music, to listen to it 🙂

    Sep 05.2020 | 04:59 pm

Patrick

I’m new to your site and appreciate you doing these kinds of reviews. Thank you, thank you. I don’t want to argue your review so much as raise the question of how Christian artists could/should add new metaphors, etc to amplify a Biblical message? If the bridge on this song, for instance, is not directly connected to a Bible passage (and I agree it doesn’t seem to be), does that mean it is not of value in our Christian walk? I would agree this bridge seems unclear (again… I’m not arguing against your review), but where do we draw that line? Should artists “limit” (and I use that word hesitantly) themselves to Biblical phrases? If a new metaphor can “add” to a Biblical references (and again… I realize how dangerous that sounds…) could it not be valuable? Thank you for this important work that you are doing!

May 31.2019 | 10:06 am

    tastywallet

    Patrick,

    Welcome to The Berean Test! I hope my articles have helped you to think more carefully about the music you listen to.

    Personally, I am fine with artists using metaphors so long as they are clear. For example, Hillsong’s Oceans uses oceanic language to communicate rescue. They use several metaphors that connect with Peter’s encounter with Jesus as he failed to walk on water.

    My issue with this song is clarity. I’m lost and confused as to what they were trying to communicate. I shouldn’t have to guess so much.

    Does that help?

    -TastyWallet

    May 31.2019 | 12:51 pm

NOTE: CHECK YOUR SPAM FOLDER FOR EMAIL NOTIFICATIONS! All comments must be approved prior to posting. Comments outside the scope of Berean Test reviews (especially on artist theology) will be edited and/or deleted. ENGLISH ONLY!

Discover more from The Berean Test

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading